ROUGH ESTIMATE

Working for Greenpeace

An inside look at those arrested at the extinction rebellion protests

Extinction Rebellion.jpg

It was not until watching my previous work colleagues being arrested on national news that I began to reflect on my time working at Greenpeace.

Before starting my day, I walked past Goldman Sachs’ headquarters and saw that its entrance was full of police and people with placards. I had only recently finished writing a story on British hedge fund Astra busy taking Goldman to court for losing $70m to the bank, which (allegedly) broke established criteria around a synthetic CDO (the same kind of financial jiggery-pokery which was going on prior to the 2008 financial crisis), so I was not overly upset by the sight of Goldman being on the Extinction Rebellion hit list.

Goldman Sachs has cleverly employed stealth tactics in London by forgetting to post its name above the building, showing that the bank has come to terms with its own unpopularity in the UK.

The bank’s strategy of flying under the environmentalist radar did not seem to have worked well on that occasion, unfortunately, as Greenpeace’s own investigative journalism platform Unearthed is filled with ex-Guardian journalists worth their salt.

It was not until later in the day that I began to recognise several ex-colleagues of mine being arrested on live television. One of my friends Kitty Stewart was arrested on April 17 while playing the Ukulele at the Extinction Rebellion protest. Her photo was plastered on the front page of the Evening Standard, along with said Ukulele.

Kitty runs a music project in Bournemouth, mostly centred around Ukuleles, and returned to her role as a Greenpeace fundraiser at the door-to-door team in Norwich in 2017, of which I was a part at the time.

I was hired as a fundraiser in early 2017 after leaving a commission-only job in sales. I was very bad at selling charity subscriptions, but found that I was slightly better at listing random animal facts and talking about evil corporations on people's doorsteps.

After a small stint leading a team in Norwich, followed by a drop in my performance, I was allowed to stay on as a festivals fundraiser, which eventually put me in the circles of all kinds of Greenpeace supporters, including opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn, members of the Arctic 30, a volunteer group thrown in prison by the Russian government after a Greenpeace mission; and another fundraiser who had hijacked a train.

Two years later, with a real job, I was one of the lucky few able to walk to work in London and so avoided getting caught in hours of traffic caused by Extinction Rebellion. My journey was not interrupted by the selection of protesters who had glued themselves to trains and bank entrances in order to bring half of London to a halt until the government took action.

“Bankers are fathers and mothers, possibly grandparents as well as employees – I would encourage them to demand their employers stop financing companies that risk the safety of their children and grandchildren or they must consider themselves complicit,” said Andrew Medhurst, an XR representative who worked in the UK financial sector.

The bank itself declined to comment.

George Barda, a Greenpeace representative and fundraiser, who often appears on the BBC, can be seen in this Guardian video arguing with a commuter at about one minute into the video. I met Barda when fundraising in Glastonbury, with one vivid memory standing out of being offered a generous helping of cashew nuts after coming back late from the festival in time for work in the morning.

Glastonbury is Greenpeace's main recruiting ground and saw the largest number of sign-ups ever recorded in a single day in 2017. I know because I contributed to some of them, which, if they have not all cancelled by now, should be equalling a good £300 or so heading to the organisation’s monthly income.

I signed up Tory supporters, a Guardian photographer, a happy Vegan couple taking their new-born child to the festival for the first time, and a carpenter who offered me ketamine immediately after signing up. Some of them were even a little sober, I am pleased to say.

But out of all the fundraisers working that week, it was Barda who signed up the most. He was in talks with Greenpeace’s UK director John Sauven about launching a large scale protest across the country, as I remember him saying. Whether those were early plans for the Extinction Rebellion event, I have no way of being sure.

Director Sauven came out fundraising with us on the second last day of the festival, getting a sign up after a few hours in the field and then retiring back to his tent. It was about this time that Labour-party leader Jeremy Corbyn showed up, dropping in to see the director before his Glastonbury speech.

This was around the height of Corbyn’s popularity, which has somewhat drained away in recent times, and the crowd was predictably ecstatic. The Labour Party leader even gave us a smile and a wave before heading off to his podium.


The Job Itself

I did not agree with every position that Greenpeace holds. There was no environmentalist bible handed round which we had to adhere to, and so disagreements could and did occur. I bit my tongue on issues such as nuclear power around other environmentalists (my view on this being firmly in line with Steven Pinker’s), as well as social issues surrounding open borders and censorship.

GMOs were a constant bee in my bonnet, finding myself confronted on more than one occasion by Norwich farmers who relied on them daily.

But I never had to bite my tongue very hard. The organisation has campaigned extensively for free speech in India, where Greenpeace representatives are prevented from leaving the country. For every position the organisation took which gave me a twinge of anxiety there were a dozen more I would happily put money towards.

While working with the other fundraisers was one of the best parts of the job, the relationship to upper management was strained at best.

After a handful of months since I started, every fundraiser was summoned to London to undergo something best described as ‘diversity training’. The training focused on unconscious biases surrounding, mostly, how male fundraisers might treat or think about female fundraisers, as well as more wide-ranging issues around race and gender.

It felt condescending, to say the least, and opinion among staff was divided as to its necessity.

Whether such ‘institutional bias’ training is becoming the norm in leftist organisations around the world, I have no way of telling. I have seen smatterings of it in journalism, though only in manager whisperings of 'diversity policy' over my shoulder.

Greenpeace itself is structured into three main groups: Management, fundraisers, and volunteer activists. I myself was of the middle category, although I did once dip my toe into the latter.

Starting fundraisers are paid £10 per hour, not commission only like with most fundraising or sales roles, and need to make at least half a dozen £10 monthly sign-ups a week to stay in the job. (Sign-ups are made via Apple IPads. Take from that what you will.)

Fundraisers also receive a bonus if they make more than six sign-ups in a week. Every sign-up on top of the sixth equals £50, capped at some amount I never reached and therefore never had to worry about. On the other hand, the organisation expects consistent performance, with employees told they cannot come into work any longer if they fail to meet targets.

We were also banned for wearing labels, logos or company identifiers while campaigning for the group, as any photo posted online of a Greenpeace fundraiser drinking a can of coke would unsurprisingly result in a big headache for the pressure group. Even drinking water from plastic bottles was taboo (banned through social pressure if not through work policy); the organisation went to great lengths not to appear hypocritical. 

The three campaigns which we pitched on in 2017 were: Palm oilocean plastics, and coral reefsAir pollutionfracking and John West Tuna were also occasionally thrown into the mix.

Throughout my time there, we were never once encouraged to pitch on climate change itself. My strong suspicion is that people couldn't relate to it - whereas dying animals pull on a heart string which is already finely tuned.

Activism

Then we come to the activists, who are the people you likely read about on the news climbing buildings or jumping in front of harpoons to save whales. Greenpeace requires someone to go through months of training and a lengthy process of signing legal documents before you can even think about committing. These activists are not paid by Greenpeace for obvious legal reasons.

Greenpeace makes it very clear at the start of the process that you could obtain a criminal record and go to jail, something which quickly deterred me from putting my name forward. Thirty Greenpeace volunteers have spent time in a Russian jail because of an action gone wrong, and another friend of a friend was interrogated by British counter-terrorism police after climbing London’s tallest building to protest against Shell’s oil adventures in the Arctic.

The incident which attracted the most negative press in Greenpeace's long history of actions was the accidental damaging of one of the Nazca Lines in Peru. A fuck up, no doubt, but one would expect worse from a fifty-year career of organising such activities.

Having said all of that, no one has ever been killed on an action. Well, unless you count the one member blown up by the French government on board the Rainbow Warrior in New Zealand.

After meeting activists, I would say it is preferable to have them filtered through an organisation which can provide training and support as opposed to letting them have a go on their own.

My team leader, for example, whose name it would not be appropriate to reveal, spent months in training to block roads in London and place a plastic sculpture outside of Coca-Cola’s headquarters, made of plastic bottles that Coca-Cola had refused to recycle after breaking a promise to commit to producing 25% of plastic bottles from “recycled or renewable sources”.

My team leader was not allowed to tell me any of this, of course. They even kept it a secret from their parents until they saw it on the news the same day. The action worked, with Coca Cola later announcing it would increase recyclable-plastic production to 50%.

Political Leanings

The thing that surprised me more than anything while working at the organisation was that it did not see itself as political. While there is an obvious slant towards the left, I knew personally many fundraisers who voted for Brexit and others who were members of right-leaning parties across the UK.

They are not the same as the Green Party, a mistake many people make when thinking about the pressure group. Greenpeace is denied the status of charity in the UK, due to some governments viewing their activities as bordering on terrorism, and so do not receive gift aid or any kind of subsidiary from companies, governments or internationals.

Originally, it saw its mission as above political strife, something which I hope the organisation is able to continue. The ability of environmental issues to transcend political division is the best asset that Greenpeace has.

For a lot of environmentalists, the cause takes on a semi-religious sentiment. No sacrifice can ever be so great as to assuage the harm which we humans have unleashed upon the planet. This sentiment was, however, thankfully absent from Greenpeace, and was one of the reasons I enjoyed being with them for so long.

The organisation is not perfect, however. One particular low point was being told not to knock on doors with Union Jacks hanging from their windows as the owners were “probably racists”. Such ideological judgment usually came from the higher-ups in the organsiation but was mercifully absent among the people I had to work with on a regular basis.

My career as an environmentalist culminated in me being thrown to the ground by police in Blackpool after sleeping in a field to protest fracking in the North of England, my homestead. Cuadrilla, the company which had been intent on drilling in the area for the better part of a decade, continued on with the operation despite the activities being linked to mini-Earthquakes happening in the region.

An Extinct Rebellion

The Extinction Rebellion Protest itself culminated in the UK government declaring a ‘national emergency’ around climate change. A hollow victory? Absolutely, but better than nothing. Civil protest on a much smaller scale than the one seen last month has a history of evoking change unfelt until years after the incident, after all.

There are many good arguments about why blocking tube and train stations is not the best approach to dealing with climate change. Won't people who can't use the more environmentally-friendly tube be forced to take cars to get to work? Or, aren't you also blocking people who work in the environmental sector from getting to work? and, doesn't all of this cost a lot of money?

The answer is yes to all of those questions. Protesting doesn’t solve every problem with the environment. But the achievements of the environmentalist groups backing the movement should not be forgotten.

On the XR event listing on Greenwire (Greenpeace’s events page), the event manager posted: “This is not a Greenpeace action but a lot of us are involved and we are all working towards the same goals.” I think the same sentiment should be mirrored by those of us who agree with XR’s motives, if not its methods.

While knocking on doors, I never met a single person who wanted to see rainforests cut down, the oceans filled with plastic, nor hear about coral reefs bleaching beyond repair. If politics is left at the table, the group might continue some of the good that led it to achieve such success in the first place.


References

BBC News. (2019). Extinction Rebellion: What happened?. [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48051776 [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Extinction Rebellion. (2019). Home - Extinction Rebellion. [online] Available at: https://rebellion.earth/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Glover, A. (2019). Plastic Pollution is a Real Problem—and It Won't Be Solved by Straw Bans - Quillette. [online] Quillette. Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/02/05/plastic-pollution-is-a-real-problem-and-it-wont-be-solved-by-straw-bans/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace. (2019). Logging company attacks free speech – paradox for publishing customers. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/forests/boreal/clearcutting-free-speech/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Khomami, N. and Ellis-Petersen, H. (2019). Jeremy Corbyn calls for unity in Glastonbury speech. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2017/jun/24/jeremy-corbyn-calls-for-unity-in-glastonbury-speech [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). How Anti-Humanism Conquered the Left - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/05/01/how-anti-humanism-conquered-the-left/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Population and Policy—A Rejoinder to Szurmak and Desrochers - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/12/22/population-and-policy-a-rejoinder-to-szurmak-and-desrochers/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Should We Be Worried About GMOs? - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2017/11/28/should-we-be-worried-about-gmos/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Teenage Climate-Change Protestors Have No Idea What They’re Protesting - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/04/25/teenage-climate-change-protestors-have-no-idea-what-theyre-protesting/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Case for Sustainable Meat - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/04/05/case-sustainable-meat/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Environment Is too Important to Leave to Environmentalists - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/03/16/the-environment-is-too-important-to-leave-to-environmentalists/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Ethical Case for Conservation - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/01/25/ethical-case-conservation/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The One-sided Worldview of Eco-Pessimists - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/12/03/the-one-sided-worldview-of-eco-pessimists/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). When a Question of Science Brooks No Dissent - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/04/01/academes-global-warming-echo-chamber/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Subramanian, S. (2019). India’s war on Greenpeace | Samanth Subramanian. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/11/indias-war-on-greenpeace [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Evening Standard. (2019). Extinction Rebellion protests 'cost Scotland Yard £7 million'. [online] Available at: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/extinction-rebellion-chaos-cost-police-7-million-says-scotland-yard-chief-cressida-dick-a4133076.html [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). air pollution Archives | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/tag/air-pollution/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Fracking is a bad idea. Help us stop it in the UK | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/what-we-do/climate/fracking/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Greenpeace successes | Recent and historical campaigns. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/about/impact/successes/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). John West is ‘paying the price’ for breaking its sustainability promise to consumers | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/press-releases/john-west-paying-price-breaking-its-sustainability-promise-consumers20160725/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). John West owner Thai Union commits to more sustainable, socially-responsible seafood | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/press-releases/john-west-owner-thai-union-commits-sustainable-socially-responsible-seafood/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Ocean plastic | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/what-we-do/oceans/plastics/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Palm oil: what you need to know | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/faqs-palm-oil-answered/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace USA. (2019). What’s Killing Coral Reefs? And How Can We Stop It?. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/whats-killing-coral-reefs-and-how-can-we-stop-it/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Jowit, J. and Gersmann, H. (2019). Fracking 'probable' cause of Lancashire quakes. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/02/fracking-cause-lancashire-quakes [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Nytimes.com. (2019). Opinion | Nuclear Power Can Save the World. [online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/opinion/sunday/climate-change-nuclear-power.html [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Perraudin, F. and Pidd, H. (2019). Anger and blockades as fracking starts in UK for first time since 2011. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/15/fracking-protesters-blockade-cuadrilla-site-where-uk-work-due-to-restart [Accessed 16 May 2019].

VICE News. (2019). Drone Footage Shows Extent of Damage From Greenpeace Stunt at Nazca Lines. [online] Available at: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/d3jbk7/drone-footage-shows-extent-of-damage-from-greenpeace-stunt-at-nazca-lines [Accessed 16 May 2019].

The Closed Economy

Why Finance Will Never Get Easier to Understand

One of the largest meta analyses ever conducted into language development, headed by Steven Pinker among other scientists at Boston University, shows that our innate ability to learn multiple languages does not end as early as we think. 

All of us, I am sure, know at least one person who grew up speaking more than one language. Scandinavians, for example, are often raised speaking at least two in the household - exposed to music and film - until they pick up the grammar and vocabulary effortlessly. 

While language proficiency stays with us well into our teens - up until 18 according to the study - the meta-analysis also underlines that learning a second language after the age of ten will not guarantee fluency.

If this ability to absorb languages is given to us before the ages of eighteen, why do we lose it? Would it not be beneficial, in evolutionary terms, to retain our ability to absorb language? 

I would say that it has not, in fact, been more useful in evolution terms to speak more than one language. 

Our ability to absorb multiple languages as a child comes from the child’s need to form an attachment with those around it for protection. All of our exhibited traits have been passed down to us because at one point they were evolutionarily beneficial. Our language is no different.

If mum speaks one language and dad speaks another, well, the solution of evolution has been to simply have the best of both worlds. The same goes for children whose school speaks a different language, or if grandma speaks another, or even from the music and shows which entertain us. 

One of the most famous polyglots to date, Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti, who speaks an estimated 40 to 72 languages, claims there is "no theoretical limit to the number of languages one could learn." The only limitation, the polyglot claims, is time and dedication - dedication which must increase as one gets older. 

However, that leaves the answered question of why we lose this ability to learn languages easily as an adult. Why would we not be better served by being able to communicate with those around us? 

Imagine a hunter-gatherer society in which selection pressures increase. Food and shelter is scarce, woman die in childbirth due to unknown illnesses, and winter this year is especially bitter. Would it be better, at such a point, to be a person with split allegiances? To be a person who can communicate with multiple tribes? Who, instead of having an obvious allegiance to one sect, seems as though they could belong to numerous groups. Would this be a person that tribes would prioritise over one of their own? 

Think of the different regional dialects of England, for example, or the difference between Cologne and Swiss German, or the various different accents which reverberate around South America. People in rural towns might have difficulty understanding others who live fifteen minutes away from them in the countryside. 

Those groups who retained the ability to speak limitless languages, at one point or another, were pressured out of existence as resource scarcity increased. We have therefore inherited a natural state of division where we are inclined to find a sense of belonging to a particular group, to speak their language, and to mimic their behaviour and beliefs. 

While languages develop once they are isolated from their language family, such as in the case of Basque or Hawaiian, language can also divide due to increased competition. The groups begin to isolate themselves as a lack of resources leads to mistrust of the outsider, therefore having the same linguistic effect as a tribe trapped on an island by rising sea levels, or jungle-dwellers surrounded by vicious vegetation. 

This, I believe, is what happens when we enter the economic space. 

I have always enjoyed the word ‘esoteric’ because it so perfectly describes the financial world. The word is defined by the OED as ‘for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialised knowledge or interest.’ It makes me smile whenever I hear it because the word is, in itself, esoteric. 

Michael Lewis, in his infamous book Liar’s Poker, talks about being unleashed as a geek trader (geek - meaning a beginner, see what I mean?) on unsuspecting investors who would be well-versed in the market enough to trust him with millions of pounds but unable to recognise his inexperience. The clients become effective career target-practice before the trader moves on to bigger fish. 

The realisation that financial sectors are only intended to be understood by a select few usually arrives at the expense of a large sum of money in exchange for that understanding. One might be confident in one sector of the market. Bonds, let’s say, or stocks. But derivatives? High-frequency trading? CRE CLOs? No thank you. 

The advantage of this division lies in the fact that it is hostile towards newcomers. It keeps those away who are not here to stay, those who are not interested in learning the lingo. In order words, it excludes those of us who are unwilling to invest. The incentive lies in making the code as complex as possible, and not in providing an easy means to crack it. 

This is not to say that learning about finance is impossible, the concepts are relatively simple when compared with theoretical physics, Paradise Lost, or US foreign policy in Pakistan - it only takes far more time to learn the jargon. The time barrier acts as a buffer against unwanted competition. 

The solution to this problem is not simply education. If a government were to teach every child about the financial sector before the age of four, the market would contract in accessibility the more new participants it receives. The language itself devolves into impenetrable acronyms, creating ever more market niches to make room in a clustered sector. 

Take the Foreign Exchange market as an example, one of the most easily accessible markets for newcomers. As the market has become ever-more saturated due to internet accessibility, the Foreign Exchange market became abbreviated as the Forex market. As the circle widened, the Forex market became simply the FX market. The competition shrinks with each layer of complexity, developing new acronyms and references to exclude those less familiar with the structure, until the private party can be thrown all over again. 

If I start writing about ‘equity’, and two people in one trading floor hear the word out of context, one structured finance employee might assume that ‘equity’ is referring to the first-loss tranche of the capital stack (perhaps of a CLO or an RMBS), while another worker involved in the stock market might think that ‘equity’ is referring to the ownership of a public company. The fact that these terms exist within the same language proves no barrier to our evolutionary inclination. 

Likewise, if at a finance conference attended by Americans and Europeans the announcer starts talking about ‘CRTs’ - the Europeans might assume the acronym to mean ‘capital relief trades,’ while their US cousins might hear ‘credit risk transfers.’ 

Here, in the most competitive space in the world, we see the selection pressure on language play out. Instead of becoming more understandable, the language devolves to become more opaque, almost as though it is being deliberately set up to confuse. 

The problem we have with making the economy more accessible and open is the problem we have of making any competitive area accessible - that it is naturally organised into a fierce meritocracy, a meritocracy which rewards obfuscation and slight-of-hand. 

For decades, there have been calls to make the financial world a more diverse and accepting space. The reason this is very unlikely to happen is that any firm which opts for this approach will be out-competed, and perish. The markets show no preference for morals. 

In time, we must accept that demands to make finance more understandable will not result in bankers turning in droves to CNN or the BBC in order to educate those of us who might have missed out on economy class. Idealistic notions, sadly, tend to make less money than realism. And until there is some fundamental change in our economic structure - and by extension, our evolved nature - this is the situation we find ourselves in.

ROUGH ESTIMATE

Working for Greenpeace

An inside look at those arrested at the extinction rebellion protests

Extinction Rebellion.jpg

It was not until watching my previous work colleagues being arrested on national news that I began to reflect on my time working at Greenpeace.

Before starting my day, I walked past Goldman Sachs’ headquarters and saw that its entrance was full of police and people with placards. I had only recently finished writing a story on British hedge fund Astra busy taking Goldman to court for losing $70m to the bank, which (allegedly) broke established criteria around a synthetic CDO (the same kind of financial jiggery-pokery which was going on prior to the 2008 financial crisis), so I was not overly upset by the sight of Goldman being on the Extinction Rebellion hit list.

Goldman Sachs has cleverly employed stealth tactics in London by forgetting to post its name above the building, showing that the bank has come to terms with its own unpopularity in the UK.

The bank’s strategy of flying under the environmentalist radar did not seem to have worked well on that occasion, unfortunately, as Greenpeace’s own investigative journalism platform Unearthed is filled with ex-Guardian journalists worth their salt.

It was not until later in the day that I began to recognise several ex-colleagues of mine being arrested on live television. One of my friends Kitty Stewart was arrested on April 17 while playing the Ukulele at the Extinction Rebellion protest. Her photo was plastered on the front page of the Evening Standard, along with said Ukulele.

Kitty runs a music project in Bournemouth, mostly centred around Ukuleles, and returned to her role as a Greenpeace fundraiser at the door-to-door team in Norwich in 2017, of which I was a part at the time.

I was hired as a fundraiser in early 2017 after leaving a commission-only job in sales. I was very bad at selling charity subscriptions, but found that I was slightly better at listing random animal facts and talking about evil corporations on people's doorsteps.

After a small stint leading a team in Norwich, followed by a drop in my performance, I was allowed to stay on as a festivals fundraiser, which eventually put me in the circles of all kinds of Greenpeace supporters, including opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn, members of the Arctic 30, a volunteer group thrown in prison by the Russian government after a Greenpeace mission; and another fundraiser who had hijacked a train.

Two years later, with a real job, I was one of the lucky few able to walk to work in London and so avoided getting caught in hours of traffic caused by Extinction Rebellion. My journey was not interrupted by the selection of protesters who had glued themselves to trains and bank entrances in order to bring half of London to a halt until the government took action.

“Bankers are fathers and mothers, possibly grandparents as well as employees – I would encourage them to demand their employers stop financing companies that risk the safety of their children and grandchildren or they must consider themselves complicit,” said Andrew Medhurst, an XR representative who worked in the UK financial sector.

The bank itself declined to comment.

George Barda, a Greenpeace representative and fundraiser, who often appears on the BBC, can be seen in this Guardian video arguing with a commuter at about one minute into the video. I met Barda when fundraising in Glastonbury, with one vivid memory standing out of being offered a generous helping of cashew nuts after coming back late from the festival in time for work in the morning.

Glastonbury is Greenpeace's main recruiting ground and saw the largest number of sign-ups ever recorded in a single day in 2017. I know because I contributed to some of them, which, if they have not all cancelled by now, should be equalling a good £300 or so heading to the organisation’s monthly income.

I signed up Tory supporters, a Guardian photographer, a happy Vegan couple taking their new-born child to the festival for the first time, and a carpenter who offered me ketamine immediately after signing up. Some of them were even a little sober, I am pleased to say.

But out of all the fundraisers working that week, it was Barda who signed up the most. He was in talks with Greenpeace’s UK director John Sauven about launching a large scale protest across the country, as I remember him saying. Whether those were early plans for the Extinction Rebellion event, I have no way of being sure.

Director Sauven came out fundraising with us on the second last day of the festival, getting a sign up after a few hours in the field and then retiring back to his tent. It was about this time that Labour-party leader Jeremy Corbyn showed up, dropping in to see the director before his Glastonbury speech.

This was around the height of Corbyn’s popularity, which has somewhat drained away in recent times, and the crowd was predictably ecstatic. The Labour Party leader even gave us a smile and a wave before heading off to his podium.


The Job Itself

I did not agree with every position that Greenpeace holds. There was no environmentalist bible handed round which we had to adhere to, and so disagreements could and did occur. I bit my tongue on issues such as nuclear power around other environmentalists (my view on this being firmly in line with Steven Pinker’s), as well as social issues surrounding open borders and censorship.

GMOs were a constant bee in my bonnet, finding myself confronted on more than one occasion by Norwich farmers who relied on them daily.

But I never had to bite my tongue very hard. The organisation has campaigned extensively for free speech in India, where Greenpeace representatives are prevented from leaving the country. For every position the organisation took which gave me a twinge of anxiety there were a dozen more I would happily put money towards.

While working with the other fundraisers was one of the best parts of the job, the relationship to upper management was strained at best.

After a handful of months since I started, every fundraiser was summoned to London to undergo something best described as ‘diversity training’. The training focused on unconscious biases surrounding, mostly, how male fundraisers might treat or think about female fundraisers, as well as more wide-ranging issues around race and gender.

It felt condescending, to say the least, and opinion among staff was divided as to its necessity.

Whether such ‘institutional bias’ training is becoming the norm in leftist organisations around the world, I have no way of telling. I have seen smatterings of it in journalism, though only in manager whisperings of 'diversity policy' over my shoulder.

Greenpeace itself is structured into three main groups: Management, fundraisers, and volunteer activists. I myself was of the middle category, although I did once dip my toe into the latter.

Starting fundraisers are paid £10 per hour, not commission only like with most fundraising or sales roles, and need to make at least half a dozen £10 monthly sign-ups a week to stay in the job. (Sign-ups are made via Apple IPads. Take from that what you will.)

Fundraisers also receive a bonus if they make more than six sign-ups in a week. Every sign-up on top of the sixth equals £50, capped at some amount I never reached and therefore never had to worry about. On the other hand, the organisation expects consistent performance, with employees told they cannot come into work any longer if they fail to meet targets.

We were also banned for wearing labels, logos or company identifiers while campaigning for the group, as any photo posted online of a Greenpeace fundraiser drinking a can of coke would unsurprisingly result in a big headache for the pressure group. Even drinking water from plastic bottles was taboo (banned through social pressure if not through work policy); the organisation went to great lengths not to appear hypocritical. 

The three campaigns which we pitched on in 2017 were: Palm oilocean plastics, and coral reefsAir pollutionfracking and John West Tuna were also occasionally thrown into the mix.

Throughout my time there, we were never once encouraged to pitch on climate change itself. My strong suspicion is that people couldn't relate to it - whereas dying animals pull on a heart string which is already finely tuned.

Activism

Then we come to the activists, who are the people you likely read about on the news climbing buildings or jumping in front of harpoons to save whales. Greenpeace requires someone to go through months of training and a lengthy process of signing legal documents before you can even think about committing. These activists are not paid by Greenpeace for obvious legal reasons.

Greenpeace makes it very clear at the start of the process that you could obtain a criminal record and go to jail, something which quickly deterred me from putting my name forward. Thirty Greenpeace volunteers have spent time in a Russian jail because of an action gone wrong, and another friend of a friend was interrogated by British counter-terrorism police after climbing London’s tallest building to protest against Shell’s oil adventures in the Arctic.

The incident which attracted the most negative press in Greenpeace's long history of actions was the accidental damaging of one of the Nazca Lines in Peru. A fuck up, no doubt, but one would expect worse from a fifty-year career of organising such activities.

Having said all of that, no one has ever been killed on an action. Well, unless you count the one member blown up by the French government on board the Rainbow Warrior in New Zealand.

After meeting activists, I would say it is preferable to have them filtered through an organisation which can provide training and support as opposed to letting them have a go on their own.

My team leader, for example, whose name it would not be appropriate to reveal, spent months in training to block roads in London and place a plastic sculpture outside of Coca-Cola’s headquarters, made of plastic bottles that Coca-Cola had refused to recycle after breaking a promise to commit to producing 25% of plastic bottles from “recycled or renewable sources”.

My team leader was not allowed to tell me any of this, of course. They even kept it a secret from their parents until they saw it on the news the same day. The action worked, with Coca Cola later announcing it would increase recyclable-plastic production to 50%.

Political Leanings

The thing that surprised me more than anything while working at the organisation was that it did not see itself as political. While there is an obvious slant towards the left, I knew personally many fundraisers who voted for Brexit and others who were members of right-leaning parties across the UK.

They are not the same as the Green Party, a mistake many people make when thinking about the pressure group. Greenpeace is denied the status of charity in the UK, due to some governments viewing their activities as bordering on terrorism, and so do not receive gift aid or any kind of subsidiary from companies, governments or internationals.

Originally, it saw its mission as above political strife, something which I hope the organisation is able to continue. The ability of environmental issues to transcend political division is the best asset that Greenpeace has.

For a lot of environmentalists, the cause takes on a semi-religious sentiment. No sacrifice can ever be so great as to assuage the harm which we humans have unleashed upon the planet. This sentiment was, however, thankfully absent from Greenpeace, and was one of the reasons I enjoyed being with them for so long.

The organisation is not perfect, however. One particular low point was being told not to knock on doors with Union Jacks hanging from their windows as the owners were “probably racists”. Such ideological judgment usually came from the higher-ups in the organsiation but was mercifully absent among the people I had to work with on a regular basis.

My career as an environmentalist culminated in me being thrown to the ground by police in Blackpool after sleeping in a field to protest fracking in the North of England, my homestead. Cuadrilla, the company which had been intent on drilling in the area for the better part of a decade, continued on with the operation despite the activities being linked to mini-Earthquakes happening in the region.

An Extinct Rebellion

The Extinction Rebellion Protest itself culminated in the UK government declaring a ‘national emergency’ around climate change. A hollow victory? Absolutely, but better than nothing. Civil protest on a much smaller scale than the one seen last month has a history of evoking change unfelt until years after the incident, after all.

There are many good arguments about why blocking tube and train stations is not the best approach to dealing with climate change. Won't people who can't use the more environmentally-friendly tube be forced to take cars to get to work? Or, aren't you also blocking people who work in the environmental sector from getting to work? and, doesn't all of this cost a lot of money?

The answer is yes to all of those questions. Protesting doesn’t solve every problem with the environment. But the achievements of the environmentalist groups backing the movement should not be forgotten.

On the XR event listing on Greenwire (Greenpeace’s events page), the event manager posted: “This is not a Greenpeace action but a lot of us are involved and we are all working towards the same goals.” I think the same sentiment should be mirrored by those of us who agree with XR’s motives, if not its methods.

While knocking on doors, I never met a single person who wanted to see rainforests cut down, the oceans filled with plastic, nor hear about coral reefs bleaching beyond repair. If politics is left at the table, the group might continue some of the good that led it to achieve such success in the first place.


References

BBC News. (2019). Extinction Rebellion: What happened?. [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48051776 [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Extinction Rebellion. (2019). Home - Extinction Rebellion. [online] Available at: https://rebellion.earth/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Glover, A. (2019). Plastic Pollution is a Real Problem—and It Won't Be Solved by Straw Bans - Quillette. [online] Quillette. Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/02/05/plastic-pollution-is-a-real-problem-and-it-wont-be-solved-by-straw-bans/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace. (2019). Logging company attacks free speech – paradox for publishing customers. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/forests/boreal/clearcutting-free-speech/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Khomami, N. and Ellis-Petersen, H. (2019). Jeremy Corbyn calls for unity in Glastonbury speech. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2017/jun/24/jeremy-corbyn-calls-for-unity-in-glastonbury-speech [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). How Anti-Humanism Conquered the Left - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/05/01/how-anti-humanism-conquered-the-left/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Population and Policy—A Rejoinder to Szurmak and Desrochers - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/12/22/population-and-policy-a-rejoinder-to-szurmak-and-desrochers/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Should We Be Worried About GMOs? - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2017/11/28/should-we-be-worried-about-gmos/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). Teenage Climate-Change Protestors Have No Idea What They’re Protesting - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/04/25/teenage-climate-change-protestors-have-no-idea-what-theyre-protesting/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Case for Sustainable Meat - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/04/05/case-sustainable-meat/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Environment Is too Important to Leave to Environmentalists - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/03/16/the-environment-is-too-important-to-leave-to-environmentalists/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The Ethical Case for Conservation - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/01/25/ethical-case-conservation/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). The One-sided Worldview of Eco-Pessimists - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2018/12/03/the-one-sided-worldview-of-eco-pessimists/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Quillette. (2019). When a Question of Science Brooks No Dissent - Quillette. [online] Available at: https://quillette.com/2019/04/01/academes-global-warming-echo-chamber/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Subramanian, S. (2019). India’s war on Greenpeace | Samanth Subramanian. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/11/indias-war-on-greenpeace [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Evening Standard. (2019). Extinction Rebellion protests 'cost Scotland Yard £7 million'. [online] Available at: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/extinction-rebellion-chaos-cost-police-7-million-says-scotland-yard-chief-cressida-dick-a4133076.html [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). air pollution Archives | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/tag/air-pollution/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Fracking is a bad idea. Help us stop it in the UK | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/what-we-do/climate/fracking/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Greenpeace successes | Recent and historical campaigns. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/about/impact/successes/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). John West is ‘paying the price’ for breaking its sustainability promise to consumers | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/press-releases/john-west-paying-price-breaking-its-sustainability-promise-consumers20160725/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). John West owner Thai Union commits to more sustainable, socially-responsible seafood | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/press-releases/john-west-owner-thai-union-commits-sustainable-socially-responsible-seafood/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Ocean plastic | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/what-we-do/oceans/plastics/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace UK. (2019). Palm oil: what you need to know | Greenpeace UK. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/faqs-palm-oil-answered/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Greenpeace USA. (2019). What’s Killing Coral Reefs? And How Can We Stop It?. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/whats-killing-coral-reefs-and-how-can-we-stop-it/ [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Jowit, J. and Gersmann, H. (2019). Fracking 'probable' cause of Lancashire quakes. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/02/fracking-cause-lancashire-quakes [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Nytimes.com. (2019). Opinion | Nuclear Power Can Save the World. [online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/opinion/sunday/climate-change-nuclear-power.html [Accessed 16 May 2019].

Perraudin, F. and Pidd, H. (2019). Anger and blockades as fracking starts in UK for first time since 2011. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/15/fracking-protesters-blockade-cuadrilla-site-where-uk-work-due-to-restart [Accessed 16 May 2019].

VICE News. (2019). Drone Footage Shows Extent of Damage From Greenpeace Stunt at Nazca Lines. [online] Available at: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/d3jbk7/drone-footage-shows-extent-of-damage-from-greenpeace-stunt-at-nazca-lines [Accessed 16 May 2019].